As a bureaucrat, I suppose these decisions are up to me. But I'd like a little opinion from consensus here before I go ahead and do this.
Some users are having trouble operating the Undo button when the vandal edits three or four times. Of course, the best option is to simply have rollback rights. With rollback, one can revert all the consecutive edits on an article that are made by the same person. Although it's a pretty useful and powerful tool, rollback is only a bit above User, since that's basically the only right a rollback has.
I've been thinking about distributing rollback rights to some of our vandal-fighters, such as Ajraddatz and Nitecrew. I almost did it to German77 when I decided it was time to think this through. The problem is, is rollback a position significant enough to be voted, like in the RfA's? Or is it something that is just distributed to the users that have edited enough to earn it?